Polls

UA4WHX, know DXer, has decided to not use Logbook of the World anymore. On its QRZ.com page he made an interesting point : LotW is a database but does not allow you to delete/modify your data. So this is a new poll to know your opinion.

Do you think LotW:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Please do send me an e-mail (xv4y null@null qslwatch NULL.com) if you want to propose answers you think pertinent for this poll.

This is another survey to see how many QSL we request per year. In this poll please don’t count the one you request by bureau. The goal is to see how much we are used to spend for our hobby in QSLing.

How many QSL direct/paying do you request per year?

  • Between 10 and 100 (45%, 14 Votes)
  • Less than 10 (35%, 11 Votes)
  • Between 100 and 1000 (10%, 3 Votes)
  • More than 1000 (10%, 3 Votes)

Total Voters: 31

Loading ... Loading ...

Please do send me an e-mail (xv4y null@null qslwatch NULL.com) if you want to propose answers you think pertinent for this poll.

The third survey try to draw a picture of the real cost of sending a QSL. Postage costs have increased everywhere (it seems) but may vary greatly from place to place. Please give us your experience for a QSL send in the last 12 months to the furthest possible location (at least a different continent).

How much did cost your last most expensive QSL postage ?

  • between 2 and 2,5 USD (32%, 6 Votes)
  • between 1,5 USD and 2 USD (21%, 4 Votes)
  • more than 3 USD (21%, 4 Votes)
  • between 2,5 and 3 USD (11%, 2 Votes)
  • Nothing, I don't do QSL (5%, 1 Votes)
  • less than 1 USD (5%, 1 Votes)
  • between 1 and 1,5 USD (5%, 1 Votes)
  • Nothing, my pal came to pick up his card (0%, 0 Votes)
  • One plane ticket, it was hand delivered (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 19

Loading ... Loading ...

Here is a second survey. The first one clearly showed that QSL Bureau is still alive but LotW arrives second (far behind). As HAM Radio is a scientific a technology hobby, I am surprised of the lack of interest to LotW. Why ? What about you ? Are you a Logbook of the World user (perhaps among other QSL ways) ?

Do you use LotW for QSLing ?

  • Yes, along with other QSL means. (89%, 48 Votes)
  • No, Real QSL are in paper. Electronic QSL has no value whatsoever. (6%, 3 Votes)
  • No, ARRL registration process for non-US OM is a hassle. (4%, 2 Votes)
  • No, their user interface is archaic. (2%, 1 Votes)
  • Yes, and only LotW. (0%, 0 Votes)
  • No, it is too slow and often broken. (0%, 0 Votes)
  • No, I don't have an internet access. (0%, 0 Votes)
  • No, I only use paper log, no computer in my shack. (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 54

Loading ... Loading ...

Following a discussion initiated by the Intrepid DX Group (Paul N6PSE) about their next DXpedition QSL policy, I have decided to start a small poll. The question is simple : Do you think the QSL Bureau system still have a role to play in the 21st century Amateur Radio hobby ?

Is QSL Bureau system still relevant ?

  • Yes, for all kinds of QSLs (73%, 206 Votes)
  • No, eQSL and LotW are the way to go (11%, 32 Votes)
  • Yes, but not for DXpedition (6%, 17 Votes)
  • No, OQRS and Direct QSLs are the way to go (5%, 15 Votes)
  • Yes, but not for contests (2%, 7 Votes)
  • No, it costs too much for a bad service (3%, 6 Votes)

Total Voters: 283

Loading ... Loading ...